Dipole sources amplify through near-field capture, phase shift, and reemission by a resonator

Evidence

The NFC mechanism was well understood by Lord Rayleigh. However, it seems that ever since Rayleigh, the usual casual explanations, something like “there is a resonator near a source and it resonates! Resonators get loud on resonance!” have gradually dulled the mind and the level of understanding. The difficulty with the casual statement is that it is not an explanation, and, worse, it is false in some circumstances. For example, there can be a suppression of the sound if a monopole source, instead of a dipole or quadrupole source, is brought near the resonator. Capture, phase shifting, and reradiation still occurs, but now the phase-shifted, reradiated sound finds itself more or less destructively interfering with the direct sound from the monopole, depending on its distance to the resonator. It is quite shocking to hear this failure if one believes that any sound source should be amplified by proximity to a resonator. Dramatic amplification follows only from breaking a short-circuiting sound source. — Eric J. Heller, Why You Hear What You Hear- An…, 1889 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Spontaneous emission spacing reflects the frequency step producing 180 degrees of phase shift.; Phase relationships between subcomponents shape a source’s radiation pattern; Driven resonator phase shifts 180 degrees across its resonance (+4 more)

Broader Connections