Diotic phase-shift controls rule out monaural sources of interaural-phase responses
Evidence
As diotic carrier phase modulation did not elicit detectable neural responses, the observed responses to IPM must reflect binaural processing rather than the monaural encoding of abrupt phase shifts (Ross et al. 2007a , b ; Ross 2008 ). — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2949
As diotic carrier phase modulation did not elicit detectable neural responses, the observed responses to IPM must reflect binaural processing rather than the monaural encoding of abrupt phase shifts — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 2985
Categorization
Category: Causal Relationships
- DEFINE: Establishes the control condition logic: identical phase modulation that is diotic (in-phase) fails to elicit a response, isolating the binaural contribution.
Related
- Phase transitions hidden at envelope minima decrease monaural detection of interaural cues (similarity 0.83)
- Stimulus design can minimize monaural cues to isolate pure binaural phase processing (similarity 0.82)
- The best interaural phase deviation for evoking neural responses depends on modulation rate (similarity 0.81)