Dialectical theology held faith as risk with humanity and God incompatibly opposed

Evidence

The defenders of this position placed a theology of the Word of God in opposition to the `Man-God’ of liberal neo-Protestant theology, and emphasized, with reference to Kierkegaard in particular, that Christian faith was a risk, that humanity and God were incompatibly opposed, and that the separation between religion and science, faith and theology could not last indefinitely if there was to be any claim to theological authenticity. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 400

Categorization

• DEFINE: Concise definition of ‘dialectical theology’ as represented by Bultmann, Barth and Gogarten.
• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 400
• XREF: connects to: Dialectical theology rejected liberal Protestantism by insisting on humanity’s incompatibility with God — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 400; Dialectical necessity inscribes lack into divine potentiality, producing a consuming God. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 688; God’s alienation and philosophical reason’s negativity are the same movement — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 756

Broader Connections

• Dialectical theology rejected liberal Protestantism by insisting on humanity’s incompatibility with God #corroborates (0.92) — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 400