Dialectical criticism reveals rather than fabricates the bond between private and social realities.

Evidence

The task of a dialectical criticism is not indeed to relate these two dimensions: they always are related, both in our own life experience and in any genuine work of art. Rather, such criticism is called upon to articulate the work and its content in such a way that this relationship stands revealed, and is once more visible. — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 775

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: Dense methodological core of Jameson’s dialectical criticism: the two dimensions are already one, and criticism’s task is articulation, not connection — a subtle but paradigm-shifting reversal of the usual critical procedure.
  • DEFINE: Defines what ‘mediation’ as a critical procedure actually does — reveals an already-existing identity rather than manufacturing a relation.
  • XREF: Directly extends the Frankfurt-School lineage — this is Jameson recapitulating Adorno’s negative dialectics and Lukács’s insistence on totality, reframed as the reader’s stated purpose. — connects to: Dialectical criticism occupies a non-position between immersion and externality — Theodor W. Adorno, The Culture Industry: Selected Essays…, 53; The subject’s unity is an effect of social configuration, not a premise — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 333; The dialectical sentence gains strength as the realities it links grow more distant — Fredric Jameson, Marxism and Form, 115 (+5 more)

Broader Connections