Descendants reversed replevin, a slave-recovery law, to reclaim enslaved ancestors’ artifacts.
Evidence
Mike was excited for the opportunity to share the full story of how intertwined the North and South were during this time when Agassiz commissioned the daguerreotypes. He was also thrilled to use replevin, a law that was created in the 1800s to return fugitive slaves to their owners, to our advantage. The law argues that property must be returned to its rightful owner, and in this case, Mike argued, I was more a rightful owner of the artifacts than Harvard. He was excited because it was a law created out of the Fugitive Slave Act, which white slaveholders used to recover their slave property. As descendants, we were embracing replevin to recover the property of our enslaved ancestors. — Tamara Lanier, From These Roots, 827
Categorization
Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims
- DEFINE: Defines replevin and its origin in the Fugitive Slave Act, plus its ironical reversal by descendants.
- XREF: Connects to the reader’s project on property law as the afterlife of slavery — the exact doctrinal move of turning a slave-recovery remedy into a reparations tool.
Related
- Lanier’s team used replevin, a slave-capture law, to claim the daguerreotypes. (similarity 0.94)
- Harvard asserted ownership of the daguerreotypes without ever stating its basis. (similarity 0.78)
- Concrete evidence of enslavement transforms abstract ancestral pain into groundable proof (similarity 0.78)