Decline of the family’s countersocial role made individuals more directly socialized by mass culture

Evidence

In short, Horkheimer recognized a dialectical relationship between family and society, at once reinforcing and contradictory, but with the negative element on the decline. Thus the essay ended on a pessimistic note: “The education of authoritarian characters … does not belong to transient appearances, but to a relatively lasting condition… . The dialectical totality of generality, particularity, and individuality proves now to be the unity of mutually reinforcing forces.” 60 The major implication of his essay, and that of the Studien as a whole, was the transformation of the family’s role in the process of socialization. Because of the decline of the “negative,” countersocial function of the family, individuals were more directly socialized by other institutions in the society. As we shall see when examining the Institut’s discussion of mass culture, these alternative agents of socialization were instrumental in creating a type of “authoritarian personality” more subtle and resistant to change than any in premodern societies. — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, 416

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s interest in authoritarian personality and mass culture — the Frankfurt School diagnosis that links family decline to totalitarian susceptibility, relevant to later critical-theory debates on the culture industry. — connects to: Mass culture reproduces subjects already shaped by systemic coercion rather than influencing them — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 716; Family structure is internalized into the superego and projected into political behavior — Frantz Fanon, Constance Farrington, Black skin, white masks, 574; Modern kinship no longer structures daily life for most people — Anthony Giddens, The Consequences of Modernity, 279 (+3 more)

Broader Connections