Decentralized internet architecture was designed for nuclear survivability, not freedom

Evidence

As the nuclear arms race gathered pace, the Pentagon chose centrally to finance the design and construction of a network of decentralised computers. Its single purpose? To work out how to make different silos housing nuclear weapons communicate with each other, and all of them with Washington, without a central hub that a Soviet nuclear bomb could take out in one go. That’s how history’s greatest ever antinomy came about: a US government-built and -owned, non-commercial computer network that lay outside capitalist markets and imperatives but whose purpose was the defence of the capitalist realm. — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism, 285

Categorization

  • XREF: Confirms the redundancy-as-nuclear-defense account familiar from Abbate’s Inventing the Internet and popular histories, worth cross-referencing. — connects to: The internet originated as state-built defense infrastructure outside market logic — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 285; The internet was built by US Cold War counterinsurgency agencies — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and…, 287; Cold War military-industrial investment made the internet’s corporate order possible — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 107 (+3 more)
  • CANDY: The distributed-network-for-nuclear-survival rationale is a neat elevator fact about why the internet has no central hub.

Broader Connections