Cultures do not die but become undead, persisting as mere lifestyle options

Evidence

The fact is that nothing ever really dies, not in cultural terms. At a certain point — a point that is usually only discernible retrospectively — cultures shunt off into the sidings, cease to renew themselves, ossify into Trad. They don’t die, they become undead, surviving on old energy, kept moving, like Baudrillard’s deceased cyclist, only by the weight of inertia. Cultures have vibrancy, piquancy only for a while. Lyric poetry, the novel, opera, jazz had their time; there is no question of these cultures dying, they survive, but with their will-to-power diminished, their capacity to define a time lost. No longer historic or existential, they become historical and aesthetic — lifestyle options not ways of life. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 1084

Categorization

  • SEED: The framework ‘historic/existential vs historical/aesthetic’ — cultures becoming lifestyle options instead of ways of life — is a sharp lens for an essay on how once-defining art forms (punk, rave, film noir) get curated into heritage rather than lived.
  • XREF: Connects to Fisher’s wider hauntology/deracination of the future writing, and to the ‘undead’ concept of cultural persistence elsewhere in his corpus. — connects to: Cultural forms ossify and drift apart from the life that created them — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 837; Demands for cultural respect signal that the culture in question is dead — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 798; Cultures represent themselves as fixed but are always changed by history (+4 more)

Broader Connections