Cultural diversity in private life does not make a nation multicultural

Evidence

But Glazer again got it wrong on culture. A truly multicultural nation ruled by multiculturalists would not have Christianity as its unofficial standard religion. It would not have suits as its standard professional attire. English would not be its standard language or be assessed by standardized tests. Ethnic Studies would not be looked upon as superfluous to educational curricula. Afrocentric scholars and other multicultural theorists, lecturing on multiple cultural perspectives, would not be looked upon as controversial. No cultural group would be directly and indirectly asked to learn and conform to any other group’s cultural norms in public in order to get ahead. A nation of different-looking people is not automatically multicultural or diverse if most of them practice or are learning to practice the same culture. The United States was maybe a multicultural nation in homes, behind closed doors, but certainly not in public in 1997. Racists in the United States were only embracing diversity and multiculturalism in name. In practice, they were enforcing cultural standards. — Ibram X. Kendi, Stamped from the Beginning, 1165

Categorization

• DEFINE: Defines genuine multiculturalism by public institutional markers (religion, dress, language, curriculum), not merely demographic variety.
• XREF: Extends Kendi’s segregationist/assimilationist/antiracist scheme: this passage distinguishes nominal diversity from actual cultural pluralism. — connects to: Everyday cohabitation differs in kind from multiculturalism’s model of distinct groups. — Farhan Samanani, Conviviality and its others: for a…, 23