Creolization dissolves the original purity of the categories being mixed

Evidence

Note that métissage exists in places where categories making their essences distinct were forrrlerly in opposition. The more métissage became realized, the more the idea of it faded. As the baroque became naturalized in the world, it tended to become a commonplace, a generality (which is not the same as a generalization), of a new regime. Because it proliferated rather than deepened a norm, it is un able to consent to “classicisms.” There is no culture rightfully impeded in the baroque; none imposes its tradition, even if there are sorne that export their generalizing products evef)T\vhere. — Édouard Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 468

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Precise meaning of mĂ©tissage relative to relation — the more it realizes, the more it fades as a distinct idea, proliferating as generality, not norm.
  • XREF: Directly feeds the reader’s tension between strategic essentialism and creolization — creolization here is not a hybrid identity but an un-normed proliferation that refuses classicism. — connects to: Creolized totality is ordered yet free of hierarchy and essence — Édouard Glissant, Poetics of Relation, 487; Creolization deconstructs dominant forms into vernacular local modes — Stuart Hall, Essential Essays, Volume 2: Identity…, 489; All cultures are heterogeneous mixtures, making purity-versus-hybridity a false dichotomy (+4 more)

Broader Connections