Court hearings can launder Islamophobic tropes into reusable official legal texts

Evidence

The hearing provides the plaintiffs with an almost unfettered public hearing and forum in which to introduce a raft of anti-Islamic ideas into an official record. The expert testimony record can then be found by others undertaking similar actions. The so-called expertise recognized and legitimated by the court as such becomes a text within a formal legal process, even though the actual assertions are false. — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 390

Categorization

  • ADDENDUM: Connects to how legal/state processes institutionalize prejudice, paralleling state manufacture of Islamophobia referenced in previous islamophobia books.
  • XREF: connects to: Litigants weaponized court proceedings to spread anti-Muslim racist tropes — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 345; Islamophobia is transmitted through state-polity dialogue via law and rhetoric — Khaled A. Beydoun, American Islamophobia_ Understanding…, 83; Courts confer epistemic authority on false Islamophobic claims — Cyra Akila Choudhury, Racecraft and Identity in the Emergence…, 390 (+5 more)

Broader Connections