Corporal punishment of Māori children is a colonial inheritance, not an indigenous practice.

Evidence

The Barnardos and Children’s Commissioner submissions also documented a finding specific to the New Zealand context: Māori children who participated in consultations described physical punishment as inconsistent with traditional Māori child-rearing practices. Tikanga Māori — the customary principles and practices of Māori culture — does not include corporal punishment as a traditional disciplinary method. These children described physical punishment as something their communities had inherited from colonial contact, not something that originated in their own cultural tradition. — , The Rod and the Child, 10061

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the book’s Season 3 transmission arc about how the ‘cultural defense’ of corporal punishment frequently defends colonial inheritance rather than indigenous practice. — connects to: Decolonization transferred colonial corporal punishment apparatus rather than ending it — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4514; Corporal punishment of children is a colonial import, not authentic African heritage. — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4804; The high prevalence of corporal punishment in Africa is historically contingent, not fixed destiny. — , The Rod and the Child: A Global History…, 4813 (+2 more)

Broader Connections