Constructing one’s self as an object of knowledge is mortiferous

Evidence

The story of Narcissus is framed, then, in the value-coding or gendering of affect in a spectacular dynamics of transgression and reward. For Narcissus himself, we remember Tiresias’s famous line: He will live as long as he does not know himself. He can instantiate, in the kind of reading I am proposing, the construction of the self as an object of knowledge. (It is perhaps in the recognition of this mortiferous autoerotic model of selfknowledge that Rousseau made Narcisse the artist.) — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader, 1480

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Tiresias’s line — ‘live as long as he does not know himself’ — is a striking inversion of the Socratic/Self-Knowledge imperative, worth chasing against the strategic-essentialism problem of whether ironic self-definition requires a certain non-knowing.
  • XREF: Directly relevant to my core question: whether holding an identity strategically demands not-knowing-it-as-essential — Tiresias’s mortiferous self-knowledge dooms the one who learns his own reflection. — connects to: Full self-knowledge is bound up with death for Narcissus; Psychoanalytic self-knowledge requires treating oneself as an external object; Perceiving one’s own body as an object converts its lived possibilities into dead-possibilities (+5 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: Self-knowledge conceived as killing the self is a paradigm-nudging inversion of the entire Enlightenment ‘know thyself’ program.

Broader Connections