Conservative leaders framed Clinton’s misconduct as a crisis of presidential lying, not sexual immorality.

Evidence

As word leaked out about the president’s “inappropriate relationship” with the former White House intern in January 1998, Schlafly lashed out: “At stake is whether the White House will become a public relations vehicle for lying and polling, akin to a television show, or will remain a platform for the principled articulation of policies and values that Americans respect.” Clinton had “converted the once-serious offense of lying to the American public into a daily rite,” extinguishing all reverence for the presidency. The issue wasn’t really “what Bill Clinton did or didn’t do with Paula or Gennifer or Monica,” but “whether we are going to allow the president to get by with flouting the law and lying about it on television, while hiding behind his popularity in the polls.” If this precedent prevailed, Schlafly prophesied, “Americans can look forward to a succession of TV charlatans and professional liars occupying the White House.” — Kristin Kobes Du Mez, Jesus and John Wayne, 331

Categorization

• QUESTION: The irony here — Schlafly decrying presidential lying and TV charlatanism while later championing Trump — is the book’s recurring continuity claim; worth noting how this frames were later inverted.