Competitive invasive species literally embody market ideology

Evidence

You have to acknowledge that it’s a winner in the free market, a success story built on efficiency, monopoly, and the creation of scarcity. It is a botanical imperialist, stealing land from the native species. — Robin Wall Kimmerer, Braiding Sweetgrass, 1398

Categorization

  • QUESTION: How far does the plant-monopoly analogy hold — is buckthorn’s mechanism of soil poisoning genuinely analogous to enclosure/land seizure, or a rhetorical flourish?
  • XREF: Ties to settler-colonial land theft claims (ch4, ch77), and to the excerpt on black ash decline; also resonates with the market-as-chosen-story claim in ch7. — connects to: Market ideology’s appeal rests on a metaphysical equation of markets with human nature itself — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 587; Neoliberals marketed the market as natural by borrowing early evolutionary science metaphors — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making…, 2127; Neoliberalism makes competition rather than exchange the essence of the market — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s…, 59 (+4 more)
  • DEFINE: Buckthorn’s growth strategy becomes a working definition of botanical imperialism — efficiency, monopoly, scarcity-creation.

Broader Connections