Colonial assimilation policy aimed to remake Africans into black-skinned Frenchmen

Evidence

I used the term first, that’s true. But it’s possible we talked about it in our group. It was really a resistance to the politics of assimilation. Until that time, until my generation, the French and the English but especially the French-had followed the politics of assimilation unrestrainedly. We didn’t know what Africa was. Europeans despised everything about Africa, and in France people spoke of a civilized world and a barbarian world. The barbarian world was Africa, and the civilized world was Europe. Therefore the best thing one could do with an African was to assimilate him: the ideal was to turn him into a Frenchman with black skin. — AimĂ© CĂ©saire, Discourse on Colonialism, 327

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the politics of assimilation that Negritude was a resistance to — a core concept in the colonial-psychology toolkit.
  • XREF: Directly anticipates the Islamophobia readings’ treatment of assimilationist ideology and the construction of the colonized subject; connects to Orientalism’s binary of civilized/barbarian world. — connects to: Early colonial education policy explicitly barred Africans from becoming French citizens; Colonial liberal assimilation differed fundamentally from later racialized exclusion — Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on
, 63; French officials shifted naturalization policy toward racial separation in the 1920s (+3 more)
  • SEED: The civilized/barbarian binary as the foundational justification for assimilation offers a clean throughline for an essay on how ‘the West must civilize’ logic persists in Islamophobia discourse.

Broader Connections