Collapse of state institutions strengthened lineage elders and clan identity

Evidence

As in Somaliland, the absence of formal modern institutions of government in the region led to an enhancement of the duties and power of local lineage elders (collectively known as isimadda), especially those presiding over a diya-paying group and directly concerned with the administration of customary law. As elsewhere in Somalia and Somaliland, the de facto power of these roles has also inevitably implied a strengthening in the importance people attach to clanship. In articulating clan identity today, as Helander records, it is usual to refer first to lower-level genealogies and segments, a procedure captured in the phrase ‘we have gone to the bottom’ (hoos baan u tegneey). With such grassroots leadership so heavily engaged in trying to cope with contemporary problems, the need for stronger, higher-level coordination has led to a strengthening of the supreme clan leaders (the isimadda), chaired by the highest traditional authority, Abdullahi Boqor Muse, ‘King Kong’, who played a prominent role in S.S.D.F. congresses. This has promoted a new trend for smaller lineages to create their own isin to represent them at higher clan levels, leading to a proliferation of ‘traditional’ leaders. — I.M. Lewis, I. M. Lewis, A Modern History of the Somali_ Nation
, 666

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Introduces the key term isimadda (clan leaders/elders) and the phrase ‘hoos baan u tegneey’ (‘we have gone to the bottom’) used to describe bottom-up clan identity articulation.
  • XREF: Directly parallels the Somaliland case Lewis traced earlier, where statelessness similarly empowered lineage elders. — connects to: Weak formal institutions strengthened Somali lineage elders and clanship; Foreign academics’ writings sustained the illusion that clans had vanished; Clan divisions persisted despite cultural unity and imperiled the new Republic (+20 more)

Broader Connections