Clinton’s multilateralist foreign policy claimed a morally righteous humanitarian purpose

Evidence

Berman’s book was warmly received, especially among liberals, who needed their sinews stiffened for the coming struggle. One can also see why Terror and Liberalism found such an enthusiastic audience among journalists and commentators: with its sweeping generalizations compellingly stitched together to form a continuous tapestry of two hundred years of history, it is an impatient person’s idea of a good history book, offering a key to all modern mythologies and explaining how we have arrived at this point. Unfortunately, the book is instead a simple, tub-thumping polemic on behalf of that humanitarian imperialism that was popular for a few years at the start of the twenty-first century. — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 622 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Clinton’s multilateral humanitarianism masked unilateral US militarism and genocidal sanctions; Clinton’s foreign policy fused free trade with a claimed humanitarian mission; The Clinton era reframed US hegemony as humanitarian democracy promotion — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 459 (+2 more)

Broader Connections

• Clinton’s multilateral humanitarianism masked unilateral US militarism and genocidal sanctions #expands (0.95)
• Clinton’s foreign policy fused free trade with a claimed humanitarian mission #expands (0.85)
• The Clinton era reframed US hegemony as humanitarian democracy promotion #expands (0.80) — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 459
• Moral clarity sells as history but masks humanitarian imperialism #complicates (0.80) — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 622
• Failing war justifications were swapped for humanitarian and democratization aims #complicates (0.75)