Churches design culture-focused voter mobilization teams to evade IRS political-campaign rules

Evidence

An unstated motivation behind the creation of the elaborate architecture of Culture Impact Teams is to skirt legal prohibitions on the direct endorsement of candidates by church organizations. Current IRS guidelines require that pastors refrain from campaigning for candidates through their office—that is, from the pulpit. But nothing stops congregants from undertaking their own church-based political activism if it’s all about “culture.” “It wasn’t me; it was the CIT” is thus seen as an alibi against any theoretical charge that pastors may be organizing de facto political action committees. — Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers, 67

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Federalist Society and Citizens United jurisprudence on nonprofit political activity and religiopolitical structures. — connects to: Tax-code limits on political activity do not restrain religious advocacy groups — Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers: Inside the…, 288; Conservative churches function as the get-out-the-vote infrastructure of a shadow party — Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers: Inside the…, 38; Churches route political campaigning through lay teams to evade IRS limits — Katherine Stewart, The Power Worshippers: Inside the…, 67 (+2 more)
  • QUESTION: Has the IRS ever actually enforced or challenged these CIT structures?
  • SEED: Angle for an essay: how the ‘culture’ alibi lets organizations run de facto PACs inside church congregations free of campaign-finance law.

Broader Connections