Christian polemicists knowingly distorted Muhammad’s biography to fit Antichrist archetypes

Evidence

One of its several nastier absurdities is the notion that Muhammad expected to rise again on the third day after his death; in the Middle Ages this reappeared in the very slightly more reasonable version that he expected his body to be carried to Heaven by angels.! — Norman Daniel, Islam and the West, 65 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Here Muhammad functions as Antichrist (although Alfonsi does not use the term), promising (but failing) to rise from the dead on the third day: his rotting corpse is presented as evidence of his error. Yet ‘Alî’s clever lie keeps the people in error; hence Alfonsi is able both to denigrate Muhammad and explain the success of Islam. — John V. Tolan, Saracens, 810 (#complicates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Christian polemicists explained Muhammad’s prophethood as a fraudulent bid for kingship; Mediaeval authors often deliberately chose the worst accounts of Muhammad.; Polemical ‘signs of prophecy’ tests were rigged against Muhammad (+14 more)

Broader Connections