China’s social credit system is a political rather than market instrument

Evidence

In the Chinese context, the state will run the show and own it, not as a market project but as a political one, a machine solution that shapes a new society of automated behavior for guaranteed political and social outcomes: certainty without terror. All the pipes from all the supply chains will carry behavioral surplus to this new, complex means of behavioral modification. The state will assume the role of the behaviorist god, owning the shadow text and determining the schedule of reinforcements and the behavioral routines that it will shape. Freedom will be forfeit to knowledge, but it will be the state’s knowledge that it exercises, not for the sake of revenue but for the sake of its own perpetuation. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1256

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines the structural difference between Western surveillance capitalism and the Chinese model: market project versus political project.
  • XREF: Contrasts with the entire Western account of behavioral surplus being monetized for revenue, established across previous chapters. — connects to: The Chinese state reasserted control when a private firm amassed vast credit-scoring power. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1243; China’s social credit blacklist coerced repayment through restricted mobility and purchases. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1246; Western firms separately pursue the same social-credit practices China institutionalizes — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 1252 (+4 more)

Broader Connections