Children’s perception is shaped by signifying types, not raw visual data

Evidence

Psychoanalysts following Freud who think that the mere discovery of the penis would be sufficient to produce a trauma seriously misunderstand the child’s mentality; it is much less rational than they seem to think, it does not establish clear-cut categories and is not bothered by contradictions. When the little girl seeing a penis declares, ā€œI had one tooā€ or ā€œI’ll have one too,ā€ or even ā€œI have one too,ā€ this is not a defense in bad faith; presence and absence are not mutually exclusive; the child—as his drawings prove—believes much less in what he sees with his eyes than in the signifying types that he has determined once and for all: he often draws without looking, and in any case he finds in his perceptions only what he puts there. — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 687

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Sartre’s account of consciousness and to structuralist signifier/signified thinking — the child perceives only what it already posits. — connects to: Category cues remain perceptually salient for race, age, and gender; Perception arrives pre-shaped by expectations and context, never raw — Sarah Bakewell, At the Existentialist CafĆ©: Freedom,…, 729; Social categorization dominates perception by selecting and interpreting sensory data — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 110 (+1 more)
  • DEFINE: Illuminates Beauvoir’s use of Piaget’s ā€˜thinking by participation’ and the artificialism concept central to child psychology.

Broader Connections