Chateaubriand made the Orient a projection of his own selfhood

Evidence

Writing was an act of life for Chateaubriand, for whom nothing, not even a distant piece of stone, must remain scriptively untouched by him if he was to stay alive. If the order of Lane’s narrative was to be violated by scientific authority and enormous detail, then Chateaubriand’s was to be transformed into the asserted will of an egoistic, highly volatile individual. Whereas Lane would sacrifice his ego to the Orientalist canon, Chateaubriand would make everything he said about the Orient wholly dependent on his ego. — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 446

Categorization

Category: Causal Relationships

  • XREF: Naming the ‘egoistic’ projection of the self onto the Orient connects to colonial psychology and racialized selfhood concepts in the undertaking.