Capitalist domination is hegemonic construction, not self-deriving logic.

Evidence

What I have actually said – and this is entirely different – is that the coherence of capitalism as a social formation cannot be derived from the mere logical analysis of the contradictions implicit in the commodity form, for the social effectivity of capitalism depends on its relation to a heterogeneous outside that it can control through unstable power relations, but which cannot be derived from its own endogenous logic. In other words, capitalist domination is not self-determined, derivable from its own form, but the result of a hegemonic construction, so that its centrality derives, like anything else in society, from an overdetermination of heterogeneous elements. For that reason, something such as a relation of forces can exist in society – a ‘war of position’ in the Gramscian sense. — Ernesto Laclau, On Populist Reason, 463

Categorization

  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
  • XREF: connects to: Overcoming capitalism alone would not prevent new forms of domination — Dirk Braunstein, Adorno’s Critique of Political Economy, 1568; Hegemony is not equivalent to ideological domination.; Capitalist logic is a fragile political construction, not an inevitable order. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism: An Intervention, 140 (+8 more)

Broader Connections