Capitalism differs from fascism in requiring no propaganda or subjectively assumed belief

Evidence

It seems that the cinema audience is itself the object of this satire, which prompted some right wing observers to recoil in disgust, condemning Disney/Pixar for attacking its own audience. But this kind of irony feeds rather than challenges capitalist realism. A film like Wall-E exemplifies what Robert Pfaller has called ‘interpassivity’: the film performs our anti-capitalism for us, allowing us to continue to consume with impunity. The role of capitalist ideology is not to make an explicit case for something in the way that propaganda does, but to conceal the fact that the operations of capital do not depend on any sort of subjectively assumed belief. It is impossible to conceive of fascism or Stalinism without propaganda – but capitalism can proceed perfectly well, in some ways better, without anyone making a case for it. — Mark Fisher, Capitalist Realism, 29

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly extends chapter 3’s claim that gangster rap forms a feedback circuit with late capitalism that mythologizes the real. — connects to: Capitalism is an infinitely plastic system that dismantles all transcendent codes; Capital’s center is missing yet still posited as a responsible agent — Mark Fisher, Capitalist Realism: Is There No…, 138; Capitalism functions without anyone believing in it, unlike fascism — Mark Fisher, Capitalist Realism: Is There No…, 29 (+6 more)
  • DEFINE: Introduces and explains Pfaller’s concept of ‘interpassivity’ as the performance of feeling for us.

Broader Connections