Capital is both a tool and a coercive force over others

Evidence

A social relation that affords capital’s owners extractive power over non-owners – besides its physical presence and function, capital provides its owners with the social power necessary to extract surplus value (see 1.4 below) from workers who do not own capital. — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism, 792 (#expands, via linked claim)

Marx differentiated formal subsumption and “real subsumption,” in which various social relations emerge from capital itself. The movement from formal to real, from incorporation to invention—this is how we should understand influencer culture. … Everything, rather than appearing as labor—the ultimate source of value—appears as capital, as something to exchange, as a material good to be owned, bought, and sold. — Grant Bollmer, Katherine Guinness, The Influencer Factory, 104 (#expands, via linked claim)

However, capital and capitalism are not reducible to an order of reason. While Foucault is surely correct that “in the last analysis, we must produce truth as we must produce wealth, indeed we must produce truth in order to produce wealth in the first place,” neither the imperatives nor the effects of capital can be wholly ascribed to capitalism as a regime of truth. — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos, 151 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
  • XREF: connects to: Capital is a social relation conferring extractive power, not just machinery — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 792; Capital’s systemic imperatives cannot be reduced to economic rationality alone — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s…, 151; Real subsumption makes social relations emerge from capital itself — Grant Bollmer, Katherine Guinness, The Influencer Factory: A Marxist…, 104 (+4 more)

Broader Connections