Canada’s security certificate regime detains non-citizens without due process on suspicion of potential acts

Evidence

In contrast to non-residents, permanent residents are entitled to a review of the detention order after the first forty-eight hours and subsequently at six-month intervals until a final decision is made by a federal court judge concerning the security certificate. For ‘foreign nationals’ and permanent residents alike, however, there is no appeal with respect to the judge’s decision on the security certificate and the test for the finding of the reasonableness of the certificate is a low one, the ministers needing only to satisfy the court that there is a possibility that the person is a terrorist or a member of a terrorist organization. — Sherene Razack, Casting Out, 74 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Canada’s 2002 immigration law detains people merely for possible terror links; Canadian security certificates require only potential threat, not actual risk — Sherene Razack, Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims…, 82; Canadian courts need only a mere possibility of terrorism to uphold a certificate — Sherene Razack, Casting Out: The Eviction of Muslims…, 74 (+4 more)

Broader Connections

• Canadian courts need only a mere possibility of terrorism to uphold a certificate #corroborates (0.92) — Sherene Razack, Casting Out, 74