Budget cuts under Hawtrey’s logic functioned to reduce working-class disposable income

Evidence

Th e Genoa proceedings relied heavily on one of Hawtrey’s insights: that budget cuts were indispensable to check the consumption not only of the state but also of the general public. In eff ect, Hawtrey’s principle reduced the disposable income of the working classes. Th is amounted to a check on public demand, which lowered and stabilized internal prices while also securing external monetary stability, since a reduction in both government and private outlay discouraged imports and thus improved the balance of payments. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 756

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The blunt admission that austerity’s stated economic logic (price stabilization) fundamentally operated by targeting working-class consumption — the class-weapon thesis in its rawest, most explicit early form.
  • XREF: Connects to Mattei’s core argument across the book that austerity is an instrument of class politics, not neutral technocracy; resonates with the reader’s framing of austerity as a class weapon. — connects to: Hawtrey blamed inflation on excessive spending by the lower ranks — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists
, 877; Austerity policies function to silence working class economic demands — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists
, 774; Regressive taxation and spending cuts serve the same class-confiscating function — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 150 (+5 more)
  • SEED: A potential essay angle: how ‘sound money’ and ‘balanced budgets’ rhetoric occludes the explicitly class-targeting intent visible in Hawtrey’s original formulation.

Broader Connections