Broad inclusion in decisions improves outcomes and fairness

Evidence

In general, the more voices in community decision-making the more apt we are to come up with ideas and eventually decisions that work toward a healthy and just society. Moreover, it seems only fair that if the decision is going to affect a group of people, they should be given the opportunity to contribute ideas toward making the decision—they should be included. This basic idea—the right to participate in decision-making and to have one’s voice heard—is one of the fundamental principles in a democracy. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education, 330

Categorization

  • SEED: A ready classroom activity: having 25 students solve a problem with 2 voices vs. all voices to demonstrate democratic inclusion.
  • XREF: connects to: Decentralized decision-making by those directly impacted is intrinsic to democracy. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education: Toward Diverse,…, 339; Procedural inclusion by itself increases acceptance of adverse environmental decisions — Richard J. Lazarus, The Making of Environmental Law, 831; Fairness is a distinct principle guiding evaluation or decision-making (+5 more)

Broader Connections