British experts knowingly framed class-targeted austerity pain as unavoidable natural law.

Evidence

Th e British experts were of course aware of the nonneutral class impact of austerity. A 1920 memorandum of the Bank of England read: “Th e process of defl ation of prices which may be expected to follow on the check to the expansion of credit must necessarily be a painful one to some classes of the community, but this is unavoidable” (Bank Memorandum, February 10, 1920, T 172/1384, fol. 30b). Th ese lines disclose how austerity proceeded to normalize class repression through the idea of “unavoidable” and “natural” economic truths that only our experts could deliver. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 1030

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to the current debate on whether austerity’s architects knew it would hurt workers — mirrors recent scholarship on the 2010s austerity (Blyth, Tooze). — connects to: Austerity experts sought to reimpose a top-down technocratic conception of knowledge — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 580; Unelected Treasury technocrats orchestrated British austerity without facing re-election — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 829; British experts justified cutting wealthy taxes by invoking a natural propensity to save — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 923 (+8 more)
  • QUESTION: The ‘unavoidable’ framing mirrors modern policy language — worth chasing the continuity of this rhetoric from Hawtrey to today’s ‘no alternative’ discourse.

Broader Connections