British diplomats saw Italian Fascism as authority reasserting itself against liberty

Evidence

In Mussolini’s senate address on June 8, 1923, the Duce asserted that “the dominant fact in 1919– 1920 … the occupation of the factories, the continual and permanent strike of state employees” had been eliminated and punished, thanks to the Fascists’ replacement of a state “devoid of virility” with one that “was growing stronger and stronger and could impose discipline upon the nation” (ibid., fol. 75). Th e British embassy described this speech as “convincing”: “his speech shows the Fascista movement in its true light as the reassertion of ‘authority’ against ‘liberty’ as the idea of government … the complete subordination of the rest to the Fascisti” (FO 371/8885, fol. 73). — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 1369

Categorization

  • ADDENDUM: Directly connected to ‘Complaints About Immodesty Go Way Back’ line of thinking about how class/identity signals get reframed — here the British frame Fascism’s violence as rightful ‘authority’ vs ‘liberty,’ a political-identity reframing.
  • QUESTION: What did the more liberal or Labour British observers think of Mussolini at this point, and did any dissent reach the embassy?
  • XREF: connects to: British diplomats justified Italian repression as a fair liberty-for-order tradeoff — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 1723; British diplomats rationalized Fascist electoral violence as typical Italian behavior — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 1726; British observers blamed parliamentarism, not Fascism, for Italy’s troubles — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 1370

Broader Connections