British colonial rule created ethnoracial divisions where pluralistic communal life existed.

Evidence

British modernization, as Salim Tamari has pointed out, accordingly transformed a complexly secular, cosmopolitan, broadly communitarian order under Ottoman rule – especially in cities such as Jerusalem and ports such as Jaffa and Haifa (but also more regionally in Beirut and Damascus) – into a more segregating, ethnoracially and religiously discrete and divided set of communities in contest with each other for resources, space, and political favor. Classic colonial divide and rule, ethnoracially fueled. … In what follows, I am less identifying Israel as representing the apartheid state as I am tracing the ways in which, in conception and practice, it has come not just to embody apartheid elements but to represent a novel form of the racial state more generally. — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race, 556

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly serves the reader’s central question: British divide-and-rule transformed interethnic coexistence into racialized segregation, a colonial mechanism replicable across axes, not specific to race. — connects to: British colonial rule converted heterogeneous Ottoman communities into segregated ethnoracial polities — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 556; Colonial rule manufactured political identities that it then naturalized as culture — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab: A History of the…, 45; Colonial rule transformed fluid ethnic distinctions into rigid binary identities. (+8 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines ‘racial palestinianization’ as the transformation of heterogeneity into assertedly homogeneous ethnoracial polity.

Broader Connections