Both German expellees and Polish settlers manufactured usable historical pasts to justify claims

Evidence

Polish nationalists, communists, and clergy spared no effort inventing the land’s “Polishness” as “proof” that it should remain inside Poland (similar to expellees leaders’ own contortion of history to bolster their claims). Much as Germans imagined a usable past in the Heimat of memory , Polish settlers constructed usable Polish roots for the Silesian spaces they now inhabited. To cope with their suffering under Nazism and their own uprootedness owing to the destruction of the Polish heartland and loss of the Polish eastern territories, the Poles embraced the idea of a timeless Polish mythology for the German cities they inherited, pointing to twelfth-century Piast princes and “Polish-speaking” stones to identify a stable and usable history in surroundings that were so drastically changed and unstable. — Andrew Demshuk, The Lost German East, 196

Categorization

  • QUESTION: This symmetric construction of usable pasts raises the reader’s core question: is group solidarity sustained by a manufactured enemy, and does this symmetrical myth-making structure also characterize later rivalries?
  • XREF: Parallels the reader’s own research on constructed external enemies sustaining solidarity — manufacturing a usable past is a mirror-image mechanism to manufacturing a threat. — connects to: Seven million expellees came from Prussian eastern territories long German-settled — Manuel Borutta and Jan C. Jansen, Vertriebene and Pieds-Noirs in Postwar…, 48; Archaeology and renaming manufacture an originary claim to contested land; German unilateral guilt narratives ignored Poles’ own comparable displacement and suffering — Andrew Demshuk, The Lost German East: Forced Migration…, 669 (+6 more)

Broader Connections