Beauvoir later judged her early ethics too individualistic and abstract

Evidence

However, as Beauvoir herself later commented, her arguments in Pyrrhus et CinĂ©as still remain too “enmeshed in individualism.” She observes: “An individual, I thought, only receives a human dimension by recognizing the existence of others. Yet, in [Pyrrhus et CinĂ©as], coexistence appears as a sort of accident that each individual should somehow surmount; each should begin by hammering out his project in isolation, and only then ask the collectivity to validate it.” She goes on to observe: “In truth, society invests me [m’investit] from the day of my birth; it is in the bosom of society, and in my own intimate relationship with it, that I decide who I am to be” (PL, 435; FA, 628–29, my translation). For the later Beauvoir, then, our “coexistence” with others is no longer contingent but rather is integral to the self; and it thus follows that the self, even conceived as a libertĂ©, is always profoundly suff used by its social situation. Because Pyrrhus et CinĂ©as still lacks such an account of the self, the essay is also, as Beauvoir says more generally of her “moral period” essays, “abstract” (PL, 433). — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 479

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly serves the reader’s historiographical question on Beauvoir’s intellectual development: her own retrospective critique supplies evidence for her evolving concept of the socially-embedded self, which precedes and conditions Sartre’s later social turn. — connects to: Beauvoir later disavowed her own ethics of ambiguity for Marxist reasons — Sarah Bakewell, At the Existentialist CafĂ©: Freedom,
, 720; Beauvoir later judged her Hegelian framework in The Second Sex too idealistic. — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of
, 281; Beauvoir’s own early maxims are as abstract as Kant’s imperative — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of
, 480 (+1 more)
  • QUESTION: The ‘society invests me from the day of my birth’ formulation is worth chasing: when exactly does this socially-constituted self claim appear in her work, and does Sartre ever adopt the same language?

Broader Connections