Bass phase distortion audibility remains unproven without double-blind tests.

Evidence

Fincham (1985) reported that the contribution of the loudspeaker alone could be heard with specially recorded music and a contrived signal, but that it was “quite subtle”. The author heard this demonstration and can concur. Craven and Gerzon (1992) stated that the phase distortion caused by the high-pass response is audible, even if the cut-off frequency is reduced to 5 Hz. They say it causes the bass to lack “tightness” and become “woolly”. Phase equalization of the bass, they say, subjectively extends the effective bass response by the order of half an octave. … None of these exercises reported controlled, double-blind listening tests, which would have delivered a statistical perspective on what might or might not be audible, and whether a preference for one condition or the other was indicated. — Toole, Floyd E, Sound reproduction- the acoustics and…, 976

Categorization

Category: Factual Claims

  • QUESTION: The debate over audibility of bass phase shift vs. cutoff frequency is unresolved — worth chasing the Craven and Gerzon literature.

Broader Connections