Award-winning journalism can propagate totalitarian fantasy for years without correction

Evidence

Duranty won the Pulitzer Prize in 1932 for New York Times articles written from Moscow in 1931. Subsequently, Duranty’s reporting was challenged by anti-Stalinist groups who regarded Duranty as a tool for Stalinist propaganda. The Pulitzer committee investigated the allegations for six months and in the end decided not to revoke the award. Years later, the New York Times would conclude that Duranty’s work was some of the worst reporting in the history of that newspaper. None of this prevented Look and other periodicals from continuing to rely on Duranty’s accounts of life in the Soviet Union, certainly a significant contribution to the slow pace of public recognition of the unique features of totalitarian power. — Shoshana Zuboff, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, 2539

Categorization

  • XREF: Links to the book’s central theme of how surveillance capitalism also remains publicly unexamined due to tolerated narratives, echoing the ‘slow pace of public recognition’ she flags here. — connects to: Totalitarian propaganda constructs a consistent fictional world that shelters uprooted masses from reality; Totalitarian propaganda wins because ideology becomes lived reality, not opinion. — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 847; The layered structure of belief makes totalitarian lies foolproof against exposure (+5 more)
  • SEED: An essay angle: institutional prestige as a shield against factual correction - how the Pulitzer halo let Duranty’s Stalin-apologist reporting circulate uncorrected for decades.

Broader Connections