Austerity operates as capitalism’s counteroffensive against democratically empowered labor.

Evidence

In other words, when economists peddle austerity as a means to “fi x the economy” their goal is something more insidious. In describing the austerityinduced economic downturn of 1921, the British economist G. D. H. Cole (who did not favor austerity) captures the essence of how austerity moves and shapes a society: “Th e big workingclass offensive had been successfully stalled off ; and British capitalism, though threatened with economic adversity, felt itself once more safely in the saddle and well able to cope, both industrially and politically, with any attempt that might still be made from the labour side to unseat it” (Cole 1958, 419). Far from irrational, austerity was a wily counteroff ensive that protected capitalism and its relations of production against the inroads of democracy. To be sure, austerity successfully disempowered the majority. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 1547

Categorization

  • XREF: This directly anchors the book’s thesis of austerity as a class weapon, connecting the interwar British/Italian cases to structural-adjustment austerity of the late 20th century. — connects to: Austerity originated after World War I as a counteroffensive against working-class unrest — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 28; Austerity as a rationale emerged specifically to answer revolutionary workers’ councils; Austerity arose in response to mass political challenge to capitalism itself — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order: How Economists…, 798 (+12 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The reframing of ‘fix the economy’ rhetoric as class warfare dressed in technocratic language is the chapter’s central, paradigm-shifting claim — austerity is not error but strategy.

Broader Connections