Austerity is economically irrational yet politically rational for preserving capitalism

Evidence

Much economic research has established that austerity has almost never worked as promised, neither stimulating growth nor reducing debt. So why does it continue to be the preferred course of action for governments? We cannot simply attribute its structural presence to the stupidity or corruption of those in government. The true measure of austerity’s effectiveness is its ability to impose and reinforce a class structure, the very order that underpins economic growth. In this sense, austerity has never been an irrational calculation. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 142 (#expands, via linked claim)

How were the experts capable of contending with such an onslaught stemming from the very heart of the establishment? Th e answer lay in an appeal to high economic theory. Indeed, the entwinement of economic theory and austerity policies— so crucial in a moment of high contestation— is the defi ning characteristic of austerity as we know it today, where consensus complements coercion. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 861 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Austerity is voluntary deflation achieved by cutting state budgets to restore competitiveness — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 25; Unequal austerity generates populism, nationalism, and violent movement instead of revenue — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 63; Austerity’s costs fall harder on the poor, making it politically unsustainable — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 42 (+24 more)

Broader Connections