Austerity is a counteroffensive that shifts resources from workers to investors.

Evidence

Austerity was, and remains, a shrewd endeavor. By critically studying its origins and architects, we see again and again that austerity was conceived, and succeeded, as a counteroff ensive: it functions to preserve the primacy and indisputability of capitalism in times when capitalism is under political threat. And it does so by introducing structures— policies— that shift resources from the working majority to the saver/ investor minority. Th e immediate distributional impacts have the important longterm function of disempowering the majority and thus reinforcing the general acceptance of the pillars of capital accumulation: private ownership of the means of production and wage relations. You get what the boss gives you. — Clara E. Mattei, The Capital Order, 1467

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines austerity as a class counteroffensive — a redistribution mechanism rather than a fiscal tool — which is the book’s central thesis.
  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that austerity’s real function is disempowering the majority via redistribution, and that policy choices thereby reinforce acceptance of the wage relation, is the book’s densest core insight.
  • XREF: Connects to Harvey’s accumulation by dispossession and Klein’s shock doctrine — austerity as crisis-driven redistribution. — connects to: Austerity may have impoverished millions to save a dying banking sector. — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 630; Austerity is voluntary deflation achieved by cutting state budgets to restore competitiveness — Mark Blyth, Austerity: The History of a Dangerous…, 25; Central banks trigger recessions to enforce workers’ acceptance of wage labor. — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 39 (+20 more)

Broader Connections