Auditory detection and discrimination are distinct abilities that can diverge

Evidence

Pure-tone audiometry tests a subject’s ability to detect different frequencies, and the dBHL values indicate the extent to which the subject’s hearing is reduced at different frequencies. It thus indicates those frequency regions in which a subject is perhaps less sensitive than normally hearing listeners. This could, for example, be interpreted in practice in terms of timbral differences between specific musical sounds that might not be heard or vowel or other speech sounds that might be difficult to perceive. However, pure-tone audiometry does not provide a complete test of a subject’s hearing ability to discriminate between different sounds. Discrimination of sounds does start with the ability to detect the sounds, but it also requires appropriate sound processing to be available. For example, if the critical bands (see Section 2.2) are widened, they are less able to separate the components of complex sounds—the most important to us being speech. In order to test hearing discrimination, speech audiometry is employed that makes use of spoken material. — David M. Howard, Jamie Angus, Acoustics and Psychoacoustics, 2369 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Speech discrimination requires five distinct auditory features — Professor Dr.-Ing. Hugo Fastl, Professor Dr.-Ing. Eberhard, Psychoacoustics- Facts and Models, 1868; Electrode pairs are judged discriminable only when performance exceeds chance; Neural evidence of encoding auditory objects requires modulation by perceptual reports — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 4886 (+6 more)

Broader Connections