As McGinn argued, introspection cannot tell us how physical processes give rise to consciousness.

Evidence

The Impossible Problem of Consciousness: An Argument for … (Preprints.org)

corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim
XREF: connects to: Human knowledge fails to answer life’s fundamental questions. — Leo Tolstoy, A Confession, 64; Science has failed to adequately answer how human consciousness developed or what it actually is. — No, Science Can’t Answer the Biggest Questions of Life and Existence; Science is done by brains and people, so claiming science can’t explain consciousness is nonsensical. — Science can’t explain consciousness because … (+3 more)

Science is done by brains and people, so claiming science can’t explain consciousness is nonsensical. (similarity 0.83)
Understanding consciousness requires not treating organisms like machines and minds like code. (similarity 0.83)
Consciousness is a phenomenon that is widely considered amenable to scientific investigation. (similarity 0.82)
Science has failed to adequately answer how human consciousness developed or what it actually is. (similarity 0.81)
Consciousness presents a ‘hard problem’ to scholars — how the physical body gives rise to subjective experience. (similarity 0.81)
The majority of neuroscientists ignore the question of how consciousness is generated. (similarity 0.79)
Colin McGinn argues consciousness is a mystery that human intelligence will never unravel, as the hard problem of qualia cannot be resolved by humans. (similarity 0.78)
The hard problem of consciousness is explaining why any physical state is conscious rather than nonconscious. (similarity 0.78)