Animal dominance hierarchies poorly model human status structures

Evidence

These parallels between dominance hierarchies in the animal world and human status structures are far too simplistic. Grade-school bullying may resemble pecking orders, but status hierarchies tend to be based more on esteem rather than raw power. Status is more akin to language, argues Cecilia Ridgeway: “a social form that is deeply cultural and socially learned.” We are not “status monkeys” any more than we are “song birds.” — W. David Marx, Status and Culture, 62

Categorization

  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source
  • XREF: connects to: Dog breed ownership maps onto social class hierarchies — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 802; Inherited maternal rank shapes offspring social status among several primate species. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 3260; Status hierarchies can emerge purely from individuals’ belonging, distinctiveness, and esteem needs — Roderick M. Kramer, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Robert W. Livingston, Social Cognition, Social Identity, and…, 855 (+5 more)

Broader Connections