An economic boom coexisting with mass youth depression signals late capitalism’s affective failure.

Evidence

What struck me about this was, “Why is this acceptable? Why, particularly in a period in which we can look back now and see as a period of boom — why in this period of so-called boom were so many people, particularly young people, why were so many of them depressed? Doesn’t this indicate some fundamental kind of affective problem with late capitalism?” It seems to me that one aspect of the privatisation of stress is there’s not an availability of a kind of cultural language of disaffection and discontent, particularly for the young, I think. And one of the interesting things about the last year or so, with the student militancy at the end of 2010 and the riots this year, is this kind of eruption of a negativity, which I don’t think was available to young people in lots of ways in the high pomp of capitalist realism. — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk, 2122

Categorization

  • XREF: The boom-with-depression paradox resonates with the malaise threaded through DeLillo’s White Noise and the affective critique in Fisher’s own capitalist realism thesis. — connects to: Depression mirrors capitalist realism, rendering collective problems as personal failures — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 2217; Depression is privatized adjustment to capitalism while melancholia refuses that adjustment — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 2289; Capitalism’s boom-bust cycles mirror and produce bipolar disorder in populations — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1409 (+7 more)

Broader Connections