Alienation, not rapid change, grounds workers’ fleeting experience while a suppressed revolutionary imagination persists

Evidence

By contrast, capital’s destructive imagination is discussed at much greater length in Marx’s analysis of workers’ alienation—a condition emerging out of the great uncertainties of nineteenth-century life: ephemerality, insecurity, and the disintegration of community caused by unbound capitalist expansion. Such imagination emboldens the power of ideology, which in turn signals the passage to capitalist modernity, fosters exploitation, and stifles human creativity. As Sayer (1990) notes: “It is this alienation rather than the mere rapidity of change (for which it is the prior condition) which underpins the transitory, fleeting and contingent experience” of workers (56). At the same time, a different type of hushed yet radical imagination underpins the collective struggles of those anxious and precarious laborers: their never fully suppressed power to imagine themselves as the architects of their own history. — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities, 140

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Distinguishes two Marxian imaginations grounded in worker alienation: the ideological-destructive and the hushed generative one that prefigures collective self-authorship.
  • XREF: The generative imagination as architects of own history connects to the book’s later counter-speculations chapter and reclaiming imaginative agency. — connects to: Marx saw workers’ alienation as rooted in imagination’s ideological capture — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living with…, 219; Enlightened capitalism captures workers with diversions that dissipate their transcendence — Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity, 89; Workers resist procedural change because it threatens coping routines, not novelty — Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of…, 843 (+6 more)
  • yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Marx saw workers’ alienation as rooted in imagination’s ideological capture — Aris Komporozos-Athanasiou, Speculative Communities: Living with…, 219; Enlightened capitalism captures workers with diversions that dissipate their transcendence — Simone de Beauvoir, The Ethics of Ambiguity, 89; Workers resist procedural change because it threatens coping routines, not novelty — Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of…, 843 (+6 more)

Broader Connections