Advertisers harnessed Orientalist excess tropes to legitimize American consumer indulgence

Evidence

The Orient as sensual and sexual was channeled by advertisers in a form that McAlister refers to as “commodity orientalism.” It was based on a logic that harnessed European Orientalist tropes of the East as excessive, luxurious, indulgent, and driven by sensuality, qualities that advertisers wanted to imbue in Americans. In these ways, the protestant ethic of frugality would be breached, marking the birth of an era of consumerism and self-indulgence. … In this moral geography, the East speaks of something missing in the world of the American work ethic; it is what one longs for; it is the iconography of sexual desire and the possibility of purchasing the feelings that go through with that desire—reverie, release, sensual pleasure—through the goods associated with it. And the department store, like the Orient itself, was grasped as an exhibition, a spectacle, even a dream. — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of Empire, 222

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The double move — praising indulgence while disavowing it by projecting it onto foreignness — is a genuinely dense mechanism for how consumer culture seduces while preserving a purified American self-image.
  • XREF: Echoes the luxury-vs-frugality tension in the Seneca/sumptuary material; also prefigures how ‘oriental’ excess gets rebranded as consumer freedom in later eras. — connects to: Orientalist imagery taught Americans to buy indulgence by linking it to the East; Early consumer capitalism marketed indulgence as foreign and disavowable; Syrian merchants profited by supplying America’s Orientalist consumer fantasies — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 226
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 222

Broader Connections