Adorno tried to defeat Heidegger’s ontology by immanent critique from within.

Evidence

In contrast to Habermas, Adorno was attempting an immanent critique of Heidegger’s philosophy of being. He hoped to provide a justification for a conclusive concrete philosophy through an immanent critique of the spurious concreteness of the ontology that was dominant in Germany. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 627

Categorization

• DEFINE: ‘Immanent critique’ and ‘spurious concreteness’ are load-bearing methodological terms for the whole Frankfurt programme.
• XREF: Links to the later Adorno-Heidegger authenticity debate and to Habermas’s different route out of Heidegger. — connects to: Adorno prescribed immanent dissolution as the method for dismantling Nazi philosophy. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 208; Adorno and Heidegger shared deep critiques despite their bitter opposition. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 571; Adorno privately identified his own critical project with Heidegger’s devotion to false trails. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 626 (+3 more)
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: Adorno prescribed immanent dissolution as the method for dismantling Nazi philosophy. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 208; Adorno and Heidegger shared deep critiques despite their bitter opposition. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 571; Adorno privately identified his own critical project with Heidegger’s devotion to false trails. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 626 (+3 more)