Accepting progress narratives embedded a colonial civilising logic inside human-rights discourse

Evidence

In arguing that human rights were prerequisites for civilisation, they accepted the directional account of progress that underpinned colonial civilising claims. … In doing so, they unwittingly prefigured the later repurposing of human rights; in a changed geopolitical context, the civilising mission of human rights would license coercive interventions to remake societies, subjectivities and economies in the interests of global capitalism. — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market, 273

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Spells out the conceptual identification between the anti-colonial’ progress account and the colonial’ civilising mission — defining how the two are structurally the same directional narrative.
  • XREF: connects to: Key human rights drafters combined universalist rhetoric with colonial paternalism — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 269; Anti-colonial delegates reversed civilising logic, framing human rights as the route to progress — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 272; Human-rights language served to restrain postcolonial popular sovereignty — Jessica Whyte, The Morals of the Market: Human Rights…, 295 (+5 more)

Broader Connections