Academics equate seriousness with docile, disengaged students rather than lively reciprocity

Evidence

Colleagues say to me, “Your students seem to be enjoying themselves, they seem to be laughing whenever I walk by, you seem to be having a good time.” And the implication is that you’re a good joke-teller, you’re a good performer, but no serious teaching is happening. Pleasure in the classroom is feared. If there is laughter, a reciprocal ex change may be taking place. You’re laughing, the students are laughing, and someone walks by, looks in and says, “OK, you’re able to make them laugh. But so what? Any one can entertain.” They can take this attitude because the idea of reciprocity, of respect, is not ever assumed. It is not assumed that your ideas can be entertaining, moving. To prove your academic seriousness, students should be almost dead, quiet, asleep, not up, excited, and buzzing, lingering around the classroom. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 273

Categorization

  • STORYSTEM: A professor whose genuine teaching is read by colleagues as mere entertainment because the academy conflates discipline with student passivity is a rich character tension for a campus-novel scene.
  • XREF: Connects to the broader argument running through the book’s earlier chapters about liberatory pedagogy, embodied learning, and Paulo Freire. — connects to: Enthusiasm-puncturing academics breed more grey vampires through belittled students — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 2446; Classroom excitement arises from collective recognition, not professorial charisma — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 25; Scholars who advocate critical pedagogy often fail to embody it in their own classrooms — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 280 (+2 more)

Broader Connections