A teacher embodies emancipatory theory by welcoming critique rather than suppressing it

Evidence

I protested. And in the ensuing dialogue, I was told that I had not been invited to the various meetings for fear that I would disrupt the discussion of more important issues by raising feminist critiques. Even though I was allowed to participate when someone dropped out at the last minute, my heart was heavy because already I felt that there had been this sexist attempt to control my voice, to control the encounter. So, of course, this created a war with in myself because indeed I did want to interrogate Paulo Freire personally about the sexism in his work. And so with courtesy, I forged ahead at the meeting. Immediately individuals spoke against me raising these questions and devalued their importance, Paulo intervened to say that these questions were crucial and he addressed them. Truthfully, I loved him at this moment for exemplifying by his actions the principles of his work. So much would have changed for me had he tried to silence or belittle a feminist critique. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress, 115

Categorization

  • ADDENDUM: The episode is a lived case of a feminist critique being actively silenced and then bravely voiced—directly parallels the ‘Complaints About Immodesty’ theme of voices being policed by gatekeepers, and offers a model of how to accept critique without owning it dismissively.
  • SEED: An essay angle: the difference between ‘owning one’s sexism’ as confession vs. substantively revising practice in response to critique.
  • XREF: connects to: A teacher’s conduct, not just content, determines whether liberatory pedagogy lands — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 281; The early feminist classroom tolerated student critique of teaching itself, enabling pedagogy-of-freedom thinking. — bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as…, 22; Witnessing a teacher embody their theory inspires students more than written work can (+5 more)

Broader Connections