A scholarly corpus gains influence through later reception and appropriation

Evidence

But The Dialectical Imagination was certainly written with the hope of conveying the palpable sense of excitement and promise I felt in unearthing and trying to sort out so radically unfamiliar and challenging a corpus of work. Although the precise historical moment of the School’s central figures was indeed past (insofar as their major work was clearly behind them and many were no longer alive), it seemed to me that the reception and appropriation of that work still lay very much in the future. The book was written, at least in part, in the hope of facilitating that process, but without inviting the uncritical dogmatism that characterized so many other embraces of Marxist theory. — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, 12

Categorization

  • XREF: Frames why Jay’s own history was written as orientation for future readers — precisely the task this reader is undertaking now. — connects to: Discursive formations like Orientalism preserve identifiable influence of individual authors through citation; Scholarly citation conventions can be replaced by conversational allusion — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 30; Islamic scholarly texts physically enacted a concentric layering of commentary around a core text — Timothy Mitchell, Colonising Egypt, 291

Broader Connections